Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc Revealed
Facts About h4831 vs h4831sc Revealed
Blog Article
This is often imagined to be the "go to" powder-or darn close to it- for almost any bottle-necked cartridge just one could handload. It is actually the foundation for a great number of pet loads, nonetheless I haven't been satisfied with the outcomes.
Certainly, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of different whole lot quantities, but I believe I realize why. It is a litigation-pushed world, and many fool would definitely deduce that he could combine H380 and H110 and come up with his have custom made mixture of powder. What a globe.
You will be appropriate they are precisely the same the SC is short Slash so it meters greater, I do not Feel you can find just common 4831 any longer
Run your load up with the particular powder (sc or common) and good deal you happen to be applying though. Exact same burn up fee doesn't suggest it'll behave "specifically" precisely the same. I've witnessed about one hundred fps distinction between sc and mil-surp a great deal of H4831.
Thornton, CO Provide of H4831SC is starting to dwindle down as well so get what you may need in your new load I might propose. May be all of nothing should they restock everything Soon but Those people powders are having transportation regulation challenges.
Any load data to support that? My first thought is it's not likely to burn all the way and velocities is going to be sluggish and all over. May very well be a nice fireworks Show!
Any one loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the outcome, any data you'll be able to share? Also needs to point out I have some ELD-X 175's I would like to take a look at out, For those who have details on that at the same time.
Like mentioned over, exact same stuff. Everything is different is the scale of your kernels. I did listen to somewhere that they are going to only make the SC Down the road. I don't know if that is definitely genuine or not but would sound right to me. I use SC because that is what I found in the eight lb jug and it really works.
Currently utilizing IMR 4831 inside of a 300WSM, and see the H4831sc is a well-liked choice for this caliber and yields somewhat more velocity. Apart from it remaining quick cut, precisely what is the difference in both of these powders, and may I change to H4831sc?
Why would I mention this? Just what exactly is my stage? I am undecided that there is a authentic valid position in addition to precisely what is preferred with most has not been well known with me at all in these instances. Do I just Possess a h4831sc powder jinx or a thing? In order to provide you with how ridiculous I actually am, tomorrow I am assortment screening a mates new .
Kansas Town, MO I'd get what ever is out there right this moment. I’ve used the two nevertheless with my drop by load and didn’t see nearly anything distinct overall performance wise.
The "SC" means Brief Slash. I have not observed a distinction between either powder dut I do not Feel I'd personally combine them.
A number h4831sc load data of the previous Lyman data just outlined IMR 4831, which was surplus army powder and now newer mfg as H4831.
I found that my 7mag 160 partitions were sub MOA with 4831sc with small to min prices. I’m chatting 2700 (it's possible 2800) fps, it had h4831sc load data been a minimal 60s grain charge inside of a Norma scenario. Not what I was looking for, but exact Nevertheless.