About h4831sc
About h4831sc
Blog Article
I picked up a 50ct. box of a hundred and sixty Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to melt away the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is 50 bullets. But I really need to locate a bullet from the a hundred and sixty class that my more mature rifle likes.
I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was acquiring additional strain and was slower compared to the aged stuff. I don't remember if I even tried out typical h4831 or not; I am contemplating not. Click to broaden...
The most obvious bring about is usually a tough/ruff bore. No degree of copper fouling reducing agents inside the powder will accurate this.
With the 154 grain Hornady SP within the 280, H4831 gave me good teams and great velocity, but Rottweil R905 contains a drastically greater velocity and delivers marginally far better accuracy. With Swift a hundred and fifty grain Sciroccos within the 7mm RM, H4831SC gave exceptional precision and velocity, but RL22 was marginally improved. Consequently, in Each and every of such instances I went with Yet another powder, but I would definitely dislike to divest myself with the H4831.
Yup or it will not likely operate perfectly. And since the OP features a load making use of Varget I would try to discover an individual to trade with. Could think of a earn gain problem.
I know, tough moments. H4831SC will definitely function, I just failed to like the case density when loaded prolonged. I do not don't forget powder demand off the very best of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps that's where I normally purpose being. In the scenario utilizing what you might have (and what I ought to have completed) I'd personally start with the end on the bearing surface of your bullet correct within the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you look for a h4831sc velocity node.
I don't like to work up a load using 1 wide range of powder and after that have to operate up all over again since I operate out and have to begin utilizing a new large amount quantity.
excaliber stated: I have identified the exact reverse to become legitimate in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and Similarly accurate powder in my three hundred Get Mag.
Along with the limited Reduce version powder arrives nearly the base of the lower shoulder so I however have lots of room.
It is humorous how through the years loading h4831sc many distinctive cartridges in many various rifles which i have not attained appropriate conclusion results with H-4831 or the shorter-cut Variation.
I have experienced comparable experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders will never shoot very well with nearly anything h4831sc apart from Fed215's. Some elements just don't Enjoy effectively with other. Looks like you have selected three excellent powders, I'd personally assume a minimum of one of these to shoot.
It's been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Located a node and shot some groups. I shot a .6 5 shot group now. It truly is a bit slower than H1000, but shoots superior. Thanks for the recommendation, It is fantastic to know that I have bought solutions when a person or the opposite powder is dried up.
Am i able to presume that H4831 is often substituted for H4831sc ? I realize the Actual physical difference but will it have an effect on the burn up or velocity? I believe not but I'm not one hundred% confident.
I sawed just one in 50 percent to view how thick the jackets had been, and they were easily two times as thick as being a fifty-grain hollow stage was. Ditto for your 64-grain Energy Level, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie canines or woodchucks. You now know almost everything I find out about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I do not know just about anything in the least with regard to the 223. I question that you're going to get everywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let's know the way it goes.